Systematics Review Structure
Focusing Techniques
This technique is concerned with focusing on one particular aspect that is presented in the object reviewer. Concentration must remain based on something that stands out, and attract attention.
The part that is considered prominent can lie in the aspect of the theme, the method of discussion used by the author, the outer cover, the author's figure, the style of presentation, or the background of the book's publication.
Comparing Techniques
This technique invites a reviewer to make comparisons of things contained in the reviewer object with other sources on similar topics. Comparisons can be made on the basis of the same topic or theme from different authors or the same author on different topics.
This technique is not possible without reading activities. The reviewer must read several different sources. The richer the percentages of reading, the richer the insights that can be used as input for the depth of comparison. The reviewer can find the strengths or weaknesses contained in a book. Therefore, reading some of the reading sources becomes something very important in determining the quality of your reviewer.
Systematics Review structure
usually follows the following pattern:
Title of reviewer
The title of this reviewer must attract the reader
Changable (identity of the book) includes:
book title
Author / author's name
Publisher name and year of publication
Number of pages
Font type
Cover page
Price of the book (may or may not be listed)
Opening, opening paragraph. Includes:
Descriptions, descriptions, summaries, which explain the general contents of the book
Excerpts from parts that make the book clear
Relation to the context of the current situation in the community
Angry to attract the attention of readers
Discussion, containing comments, reviews, critical analysis, and assessment of the contents of the book. This is the essence of a reviewer, namely the reviewer commenting on or evaluating a book from various aspects, namely the external and content aspects, including:
Analysis of the contents of the book is accompanied by reasons and evidence contained in the contents of the book
Analysis of strengths and weaknesses (if any) of the content of the book that is reviewed by comparison with different sources
The writer's ideas about the contents of the book
Closing, including the review writer's assessment of whether or not the reviewer should read or own the book. This concluding sentence is more of a recommendation for the reader, although sometimes it is not stated in detail.
The identity of the reviewer is often included at the end of the reviewer to show the reviewer's authority.
Benefits of Review
1. Material consideration
To give an idea to the readers about a work and to influence them on the work.
2. Economic value
To get money or rewards from books that are freely licensed from book publishers if the review is published in a newspaper or magazine.
3. Means of book promotion
The books that are being reviewed are new books that have never been reviewed. therefore, the reviewer is a medium to promote the new book.
4. Creativity Development
To develop a creativity in writing, in making a book review must have an element so that the review is clear and of good quality.
Tips for writing a reviewer
Review writings that describe a book / film must be in accordance with the complete contents. Therefore, the main requirement for a reviewer is that the reviewer must first read / watch and understand the book / film to be reviewed.
Do a sharp and reasoned analysis. First, observe the benefits. Where does the book benefit the reader and include the evidence and why.
Use language that is structured, straightforward and clear so that it makes it easy for readers to understand your writing. The use of long, long-winded sentences will obscure the message conveyed. Choose the right and appropriate words to compile your reviewer's writing.
Reviewers
At first the novel was just honi writing and always wanted to try new things. The author began writing at the time of junior high school which had not yet been completed and had stopped several years, until the writer had the desire to continue writing again during high school. The story in this novel is the imagination of the writer himself. This paper was later blamed on one of the publishers, then unexpectedly published his novel and became a best seller novel in 2005. This novel was also appointed to the big screen in 2007.